A CONCEPT OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY
Figure 1. The Local Economy
Figure 1 illustrates this concept of a
local economy. Dollars flow into the local economy from the sale of "exports," and
dollars are created when local residents purchase locally produced products and services. Dollars
leave the local economy when imported inputs are bought and when national and state taxes are
paid and outside investments are made.
Figure 2. Development of a Multiplier.
Figure 2 illustrates this process. Round
1 shows an initial new dollar of income coming into the local economy from, for example, the
increase in outside sales for the local factory. If 60 cents (or 60%) of this dollar is
"leaked" outside the local economy via outside taxes, outside investments, and goods
and services purchased from outside the local economy, then 40 cents (40%) will be re-spent
locally. This is shown in Round 2.
SIZES OF MULTIPLIERS
USING MULTIPLIERS
The formulas for using the income and employment multipliers are:
It is useful to think of a local
economy as an entity which trades with other local economies. People and firms in a local
economy "earn" money for the local area in two ways. First, money is earned by
selling products and services to buyers outside the local area. These sales are called
"exports." Second, money is earned by having dollars re-spent on local products and
services.
Once inside the local economy, dollars
"leak" to outside economies in three possible ways. First, dollars spent on goods and
services purchased from outside the local area flow to outside economies. These
purchases are called imports. Second, dollars leave the local economy when taxes are paid to
national and state governments. Third, dollars flow outside the local economy when investments
are made outside the local area.
Let's consider in more detail what
happens when dollars are spent on locally produced goods and services. Consider this example.
Say a local factory experiences an increase in its sales outside the local economy. This means an
increase in "exports" and an increase in dollars flowing into the local economy. These
new dollars will go into the pockets of the factory owners, managers, and workers. These local
residents will see an increase in their income.
But the process won't stop there. The
factory owners, managers, and workers will use the new dollars to pay taxes, to make
investments, to buy goods and services produced outside the local economy, and to buy goods
and services produced inside the local economy. New dollars which are used to pay national and
state taxes, which are used to purchase investments outside the local economy, and which are
used to purchase goods and services produced outside the local economy are lost to the local
economy. That is, these dollars "leak" to outside the local economy.
But the new dollars which are spent on
locally produced goods and services create a "ripple" effect in the local economy.
When one of the factory workers with "new" dollars spends some of those dollars in
local restaurants, local supermarkets, and local malls and departments stores, these dollars
become income to the owners and workers in those enterprises. Likewise, these owners and
workers in local restaurants, supermarkets, and other shops will, in turn, spend some of their
"new" dollars on locally produced goods and services, so these dollars become
income a third time to other local citizens.
If, again, 40% of all income is re-spent
locally, then 40% of the 40 cents in Round 2 will be spent again in the local economy. This
results in 16 cents (.40 x 40 cents) being re-spent locally and 24 cents (.60 x 40 cents) of leakage
in Round 3.
The process continues as shown in
Figure 2. Although six rounds of spending are shown in the figure, the process can go on
indefinitely. However, the dollar amounts become progressively smaller in later rounds.
What, then, is the total amount of new
income which occurs in a local economy from each initial new dollar of earned income? The
answer can be found for the example in Figure 2 by adding the new income at each of the six
rounds. That is, the total amount of new income is the sum of:
$1.00 from
Round 1
+ $0.40 from Round 2
+ $0.16 from Round 3
+ $0.06 from Round 4
+ $0.02 from Round 5
+ $0.01 from Round 6
= $1.65 of new income.
So, in our example, $1.65 of new
income and spending results from each initial new $1.00 of earned income. The ratio of $1.65 to
$1.00 is 1.65. The number 1.65 is called the "income multiplier." The income
multiplier can be used to estimate the total amount of new local spending resulting from an initial
increase in
local income. If, in our example, the local factory sees its sales to outside the area increase by
$100,000, and
if the income multiplier is 1.65, then the estimate of new local spending is $100,000 x 1.65, or
$165,000.
There are two commonly used
multipliers. One is the income multiplier which was explained above. The second is the
employment multiplier. The employment multiplier works the same way as the income multiplier.
If the initial number of new jobs created by, say, an existing factory in the local economy
expanding or a new business moving to the local area, is multiplied by the "employment
multiplier," then the result is the total new employment in the local economy.
How big are these income and
employment multipliers? Sometimes claims are made that income multipliers are in the range of 5
to 7, meaning that $5 to $7 total dollars of income and spending are created in a local economy
from each new dollar of initial spending. Such ranges for the income multiplier are totally out of
line! A tremendous amount of "leakage" occurs in local economies, because most
local economies "import" a significant amount of their goods and services.
Table 1 gives average income and
employment multipliers for North Carolina communities. The multipliers differ by industry
because each industry has a slightly different structural relationship with other industries and hires
a different number of workers per dollar of sales.
As can be seen in Table 1, most of the
income multipliers are in the range of 1.5 to 2.5. Most of the employment multipliers are in the
range of 20 to 40 employees per $million in sales.
| (1) | initial annual change in $ earned for county |
× | income multiplier | = | total annual change in $ spending in county |
| (2) | initial annual change in $ earned for county, in $ millions |
× | employment multiplier | = | total change in jobs in county |
Table 1. North Carolina Income and Employment Multipliers by Economic Sectors.
| Income Multiplier | Employment Multiplier | |
| Agricultural products | 2.00 | 25.9 |
| Forestry and fishery products | 1.51 | 8.8 |
| Mining | 1.82 | 20.4 |
| New construction | 2.28 | 35.9 |
| Maintenance & repair construction | 2.20 | 41.4 |
| Manufacturing: | ||
| Food & tobacco processing | 2.05 | 17.2 |
| Textile products | 2.68 | 33.4 |
| Apparel | 2.67 | 43.8 |
| Paper & allied products | 2.24 | 22.4 |
| Printing & publishing | 2.16 | 31.9 |
| Chemicals & petroleum refining | 1.93 | 18.4 |
| Rubber & leather products | 2.01 | 25.1 |
| Lumber & wood products & furniture | 2.42 | 36.6 |
| Stone, clay, & glass products | 2.07 | 29.1 |
| Primary metal industries | 2.06 | 21.1 |
| Fabricated metal products | 1.91 | 25.5 |
| Non-electrical machinery | 2.13 | 26.2 |
| Electric & electronic equipment | 2.15 | 28.1 |
| Motor vehicles & equipment | 2.06 | 23.0 |
| Other transportation equipment | 2.15 | 29.0 |
| Instruments & related products | 2.02 | 28.9 |
| Other manufacturing | 2.20 | 32.4 |
| Transportation services | 1.98 | 32.6 |
| Communication | 1.69 | 21.1 |
| Public utility services | 1.45 | 9.1 |
| Wholesale trade | 1.84 | 29.1 |
| Retail trade | 2.04 | 52.3 |
| Finance | 2.03 | 33.5 |
| Insurance | 2.36 | 38.5 |
| Real estate | 1.27 | 5.2 |
| Hotels, lodging places, & amusements | 1.92 | 44.7 |
| Personal services | 2.06 | 53.5 |
| Business services | 2.02 | 43.5 |
| Restaurants | 2.11 | 50.9 |
| Health services | 2.12 | 40.3 |
| Other services | 2.12 | 41.2 |
Let's look in detail at each of these
formulas and their components. The first component in each formula, "initial annual change
in $ earned for county," can be a positive or a negative number. It is a positive number for
an economic expansion, that is, for a local business increasing its sales or a new business opening
in the county. It is a negative number for an economic decline, meaning a local business has
downsized or has completely closed.
The first component is best measured by
the "annual change in the dollar value of sales to outside the county." That is, for the
new local business, for the local business which is expanding its sales, for the local business which
is reducing its sales, or for the local business which is closing its doors, we want the annual dollar
value of change in sales to buyers who are located outside the county. For business expansions,
this number will be positive, and for business declines, this number will be negative.
The second component is the multiplier
from Table 1. Use the multiplier from the industry which best fits the business that is expanding
or contracting.
The last component is the total annual
change in spending in the county, in the case of formula (1), or the total change in jobs in the
county, in the case of formula (2). These results are positive for economic expansion and
negative for economic decline. The total change in spending occurs each year. The total change
in jobs occurs as soon as the economic change is fully implemented and is maintained in
succeeding years.
| (3) | construction cost spent on local inputs | × | 2.28 | = | one-time new spending in county from construction |
| (4) | construction cost spent on local inputs, in $millions | × | 35.9 | = | one-time new employment in county from construction |