
INTRODUCTION
In the early versions of Soil Taxonomy micromorphology held a
more significant place than it does now. One has only to read
the descriptions of the spodic and argillic horizons in the 7th
Approximation and the 1996 Keys to Soil Taxonomy to see the
change. Two reasons for the change follow. First of all W.L.
Kubiena, Roy Brewer, J.R. sleeman, along with others (A.
Jongerius and R.W. Fitzpatrick for example) were developing the
tools and terms for description of soil fabrics during the time
Soil Taxonomy was developing. Others like John Cady and Klaus
Flach were conversant in both endeavors and thus were in position
to influence the direction of Soil Taxonomy toward micromorphic
techniques. Secondly with time it became more and more apparent
that it was more practical to classify soils based on properties
that could be observed in the field. Only hand specimen-
verifiable microfabric features survived the changes in Soil
Taxonomy. With experience soil morphologists are able to
'identify' soil fabrics in hand specimen as well as in thin
section. Using this approach fewer profiles were reclassified
later when laboratory data became available.
However, there are still a few Soil Taxonomy criteria that require microfabric description. There are still other diagnostic horizons that may be identified using microfabric descriptions. Finally there are some general relationships between the soil fabrics and kinds of soil orders. In the case of Spodosols the range in kinds of fabrics is narrow, whereas in Inceptisols and Entisols the range is broad. In the slides I will show at the conference I will present some of teh observations Dr. Douglas Wysocki and I have made relating soil fabrics and soil taxa.
DIAGNOSTIC HORIZONS THAT HAVE SOME MICROFABRIC CRITERIA
DIAGNOSTIC HORIZONS THAT INCLUDE MICROFABRIC DESCRIPTION AS
SUPPLEMENTARY (NON-DIAGNOSTIC) CRITERIA
CONCLUSIONS
the most effective soil scientists are able to see across the
scale gap between morphologic features in hand specimen and the
features as observed in thin section or with the scanning
electron microscope. Such knowledge comes through experience.
Some soil scientists have preferred to describe the soil features
using descriptive sentences. Others prefer well accepted therms.
The terms' approach seems best suited to storage and retrieval of
information and statistical analysis of data.

This page
(http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/plymouth/programs/diagnostic.html)
created by
Vera MacConnell,
Research Technician, I
on March 9, 1998.
Last Updated on March 9, 1998.