Updated 10/3/95
Most commercially valuable tree species found in North Carolina require full or almost full sunlight for seed germination, establishment and early growth. For regeneration to succeed, remove competing trees, weeds and brush or else reduce their density. Such steps must be taken before planting or before pines or hardwoods can regenerate naturally. To do this, several alternative site preparation methods are available to landowners. Which method(s) is selected will depend on the type, composition and density of the competition.
Site preparation may not be necessary when cropland is converted to timber production or where a logging operation leaves a site sufficiently free of weeds and brush.
Soil type, soil moisture and geographic region must also be considered. For example, highly productive soils will require more intensive site preparation than less productive soils due to competing vegetation's faster growth. To prevent soil damage during preparation, restrict the operation of heavy equipment when soil moisture is high. Furthermore, soil disturbance on steep slopes should be limited to minimize erosion.
Alternatives for site preparation include heavy equipment, manual labor, herbicides and fire. Costs of site preparation range from $10 per acre for burning to over $200 per acre for the more mechanical methods.
The best method would be one which achieves the owner's goals and objectives such as:
Shearing or KG Blading is the best way to remove large numbers of stems over 4 inches in diameter. Shearing or KG blades are bulldozer blades with a sharpened lower edge, are angled or V-shaped and have a "stinger" for splitting large trees and stumps. With care, trees can be sheared at ground level and felled or piled (windrowed) with little soil disturbance. An inexperienced or careless bulldozer operator, in contrast, can reduce soil quality by compacting, mixing soils or moving productive topsoil into piles. To minimize erosion and site deterioration, limit shearing to moderate slopes and stable soils.
Drum chopping can be effective where brush competition is dense but of small diameter (less than 4 inches). A rolling drum chopper with offset blades is used to uproot, chop and compact brush; it continues to displace roots which reduces resprouting. An experienced operator carefully matches chopper size and weight to the density and size of competition. This is essential to minimize soil damage especially on shallow soils, heavy clay soils or soils that are low in nutrients. If additional weight is necessary, fill the chopper with water.
Summer chopping (late June to August) is best in several ways. First, it reduces resprouting. Second, the compacted brush provides adequate fuel necessary to burn the chopped area 4 to 6 weeks later. Finally, summer chopping produces a "triple kill" when frost kills those stems which resprout following chop and burn.
Lopping involves using hand tools or chain saws to fell residual stems and leaving the felled stems where they fall. Lopping is cost effective where scattered large diameter residuals are present. Because it offers little soil disturbance, lopping is a good choice for fragile soils or steep slopes with a high risk of erosion. Lopping can be especially useful on tracts too small for heavy equipment.
Herbicides can be a safe, economical alternative to manual or mechanical methods, since herbicides may be broadcast by air or ground. They can also be used to treat individual stems by tree injection, stump treatment or basal spraying.
Several herbicides are labeled for site preparation. The success of chemical weed control depends on the size, density and composition of vegetation; on the kind and formulation of herbicide; on the volume applied and timing of application; and on proper equipment selection and calibration. Labeled herbicides applied according to label directions can be used with a minimum of concern regarding harm to humans, wildlife, soil, air or water.
Discing with heavy discs may be all that is required to prepare a site for natural seeding or direct seeding.
Fire is used alone or in combination with the methods above. Fire improves access and visibility and facilitates planting; it also controls competing vegetation. Although burning is simple and cheap, it should be done only by trained personnel under carefully controlled conditions. The North Carolina Division of Forest Resources and several private contractors provide site preparation burning services.
Bedding, scalping, drainage or water control may be needed in certain situations. Raised beds on excessively wet areas improve drainage, make planting easier and increase seedling survival and growth. A scalper may be used to remove grass competition and clear small trash from the planting area. In very poorly drained or excessively wet areas, installing drainage ditches or water control structures may be the only practical method to insure seedling survival and early growth. A topographic survey and soils evaluation are vital to properly design a drainage system.
General items to include in a site preparation contract include:
Shearing or KG Blading
Several site preparation alternatives are available to woodlot owners. Choose the method which achieves the set goals and objectives at the lowest cost. Several points must be considered: soils, terrain, vegetative cover, tract size, capital and tree species. Consult a professional forester for help in selecting the proper method for a specific site and to determine if the site's potential justifies the cost to prepare it. Consult the North Carolina Forest Service, the county Extension agent, forest industry personnel or a consulting forester for more information.
Prepared by:
Rick Hamilton,
Extension Forest Resources
Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Distributed in furtherance of the Act of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.
9/85
WON-15