REFORESTATION AS AN INVESTMENT: DOES IT PAY?

Updated 10/3/95

Many investment analysts consider reforestation one of the best long-term investment opportunities available to landowners. This conclusion is based on the appreciation of timber products over the past 50 years. On the basis of trends, analysts confidently make the following predictions:

Although the future looks particularly promising for timber investments, foresters are concerned because many nonindustrial, private woodlot owners do not adequately reforest harvested acres. These private owners, who own or control about 80 percent of North Carolina's commercial timberland, are losing a tremendous opportunity to produce future timber income.

Many landowners regularly invest in other long-term investments such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), stocks, and bonds, but forgo the likely chance to earn high returns from timber production. Tax incentives, costsharing programs, and increased property value are added benefits of reforestation. See Woodland Owner Note 4, Financial Incentives for Timber Management, for more information.

Information Needed to Analyze A Reforestation Investment

To analyze the potential benefits of reforesting, you will need four items of information:

1. The productive capability of the area to be planted. A forester can estimate the "Site Index" (SI). SI is the total height to which dominant trees of a given species will grow on a given site by some index age, usually 25 or 50 years. For example, if the site index for a particular site is 70 at 50 years for loblolly pine, foresters expect loblolly seedlings planted on that site today to be 70 feet tall in 50 years.

Once the forester determines the site index, future timber yields can be predicted. Yields will vary according to the number of trees per acre, frequency and intensity of thinnings, and the expected or desired rotation age. Woodland Owner Note 7, Forest Soils and Site Index, provides more details on this subject.

2. The costs of site preparation and reforestation. Reforestation costs depend on the condition of the site to be reforested. Costs to prepare the site may range from none to more than $200 per acre. If the site is free of competing vegetation, no preparation may be necessary. This is occasionally the case if the area has been completely harvested or is an old field. Site preparation costs increase to the upper limit as the amount of competing vegetation increases and will be greater if the site requires draining, ditching, bedding, or fertilization.

The costs of replanting or reseeding normally will not exceed $70 per acre. There is no cost if natural seeding has adequately restocked the area with seedlings of a desirable tree species.

3. The amount and frequency of management activities required to maintain and protect a vigorous stand. Landowners may periodically encounter such costs as prescribed burning, boundary line maintenance, fire line construction and maintenance, and insect or disease protection. These costs normally will not exceed $2 per acre per year.

4. An estimate of the future value of harvested timber products. Future timber value can be projected by increasing the present timber price to reflect the expected increase in timber prices over time. Although stumpage prices will fluctuate in the short term, real sawtimber prices (in excess of inflation) may increase over the long run. Trends indicate that historically prices have increased from 1 to 1.5 percent annually more than inflation. You may wish to add an inflation factor to this expected real increase when calculating future incomes.

On the other hand, pulpwood prices have not kept pace with inflation in North Carolina. Increased market competition, however, is expected to improve their performance.

Examples: Analyzing a Reforestation Investment

The costs and returns from reforesting 1 acre of timber to loblolly pine are used in two examples to illustrate a reforestation investment. (NOTE: Loblolly pine is used for example only. Species such as longleaf, shortleaf, white, Virginia pine, and pond pine, as well as other softwood or broadleaf species, may be better choices depending on site and soil characteristics or geographic region. The procedures for evaluating reforestation or management investments in these species would be the same.)

A basic assumption for both examples is that the current stumpage price is $147 per thousand board feet of sawtimber. This price is the average for Southern yellow pine in the North Carolina piedmont and coastal plain as reported in Timber-Mart South for the second quarter of 1988. The same publication indicates an average price of $11.85 per cord for pine pulpwood. For both examples it is first assumed that sawtimber prices will increase 1 percent annually; the computations are then repeated assuming prices remain constant. Pulpwood prices are assumed to remain the same.

For Example 1, total site preparation and reforestation costs are assumed to be $165. Cost sharing will reimburse the owner for 40 percent of that cost; the landowner can also claim a 10 percent investment tax credit and can write off 95 percent of the total cost as amortized deductions over 84 months. These benefits reduce the out-of-pocket cost of reforestation to $47.51 (assuming a 28 percent marginal tax rate and discounting future tax savings at a 7 percent annual rate).



Example 1. Annual after-tax return on $165 investment for Loblolly pine.

For Example 2 the total cost of reforestation is assumed to be $65 per acre. This rate would be realistic if a good, clean harvest has left the area clear of debris and no site preparation is therefore required. An even lower reforestation cost is possible if a clean harvest is done at the proper time in a good seed year. These conditions are favorable for natural regeneration by shelterwood, seed tree, or seed-in-place methods further explained in Woodland Owner Note 9, Reforestation of Southern Pines. After cost-sharing reimbursement and tax incentives, the out-of-pocket cost for Example 2 is $18.73.



Example 2. Annual after-tax return on $65 investment for Loblolly pine.

Other assumptions for both examples are that:

1. All costs and returns are after tax assuming a 28 percent marginal tax bracket.

2. After-tax management costs are $2 per acre per year.

3. The rotation age for loblolly pine is 35 years, assuming 350 trees per acre initially with no thinnings for pulpwood.

Future incomes are discounted to the present at a 4 percent annual rate approximating the real rate of return to productive investments for the past 40 years.

Several definitions may be helpful to understand and interpret the following example:

Net Present Value (NPV) is the present (today's) value of expected future returns minus the present value of expected future costs. Investments with a positive NPV yield a higher return than the interest rate used in discounting future returns minus costs. When comparing investments, the one with the highest NPV (assuming the same discount rate) is the more desirable.

Net Annual Equivalent (NAE) is the conversion of NPV to an equal annual amount over the life of the investment.

Return On Investment (ROI) is the internal annual rate of return of an investment. It is the compound interest rate that equates the present value of future incomes with the present value of future costs. An investment is acceptable if the ROI equals or exceeds the minimum acceptable rate of return. In choosing between two investments, the investment with the higher ROI is preferred.

To assess the value of forestry investments, compare after-tax returns to alternative investment opportunities. Returns will vary with soil quality, length of growing period, investment and management strategies, market competition, tax bracket, and tree species. The examples given here assume zero inflation and thus reflect real rather than inflated returns. Nominal rates of return (including inflation) are approximated by adding the inflation rate to these real rates of return.

In making investments, people forgo present consumption in the hope of generating a greater future income. For an investment to be worthwhile, the present value of estimated future returns must exceed investment costs. A prudent investor will weigh alternative opportunities and choose one that yields the greatest return, allowing for risk. Risks associated with forestry investments include devastation of timber by insects, diseases, and wildfires. Proper timber management greatly reduces these risks by fostering vigorous protected timber stands.

This publication illustrates that reforestation can be an excellent long-term investment. Forest landowners should consider soil quality, tree species, local markets, costs, and anticipated yields before investing in reforestation or timber stand management. For more information and help in evaluating a particular timber investment opportunity, contact your county North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent, local North Carolina Forest Service Office, or a professional forester.

Prepared by
Rick Hamilton, Extension Forest Resources Specialist

Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE

Distributed in furtherance of the Act of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

2/89-5M-MJS

WON-8 (Revised)