December 1998
Reporting the responses for November 1997- December 1998
Statewide Results
The charts below illustrate statewide averages for occupancy and average daily rates.
Figure 1
Figure 2

Table1 illustrates the changes in occupancy and average daily rates over the last five years. Note that comparisons are made with the Quarters of past years. Comparisons also reflect a change in Economic Development Regions as of January 1997. Seasonal properties that were closed during these months are not included in the calculations.
Table 1. Comparison of Statewide Occupancy and Average Daily Rates, 1994-1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Feb OCC |
|
|
|
||
| Feb ADR |
|
|
|
||
| Mar OCC |
|
|
|
||
| Mar ADR |
|
|
|
||
| Apr OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Apr ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| May OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| May ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jun OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jun ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jul OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jul ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aug OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aug ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sep OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sep ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oct OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oct ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nov OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nov ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dec OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dec ADR |
|
|
|
|
Regional Results
The rest of this report presents the results of the monthly accommodations survey for January 1998 through December 1998. The 7 economic development regions as defined by the North Carolina Travel and Tourism Division are used.
Table 2 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic Development Region
January, February and March 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.25%
|
$70.39
|
23.69%
|
$68.79
|
28.84%
|
$53.84
|
|
|
48.88%
|
$45.11
|
52.36%
|
$45.52
|
60.24%
|
$43.63
|
|
|
46.86%
|
$51.54
|
55.65%
|
$50.01
|
63.15%
|
$49.97
|
|
|
55.58%
|
$70.65
|
67.57%
|
$70.31
|
70.34%
|
$74.28
|
|
|
30.27%
|
$59.46
|
32.66%
|
$59.65
|
48.58%
|
$58.27
|
|
|
37.55%
|
$33.98
|
52.54%
|
$36.97
|
39.08%
|
$48.59
|
|
|
20.28%
|
$45.85
|
27.86%
|
$56.60
|
34.44%
|
$48.68
|
|
|
37.38%
|
$53.85
|
44.62%
|
$55.41
|
49.24%
|
$53.89
|
Table 3 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic Development Region
April, May and June 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic Development Region
July, August and September 1998
|
|
Jul OCC | Jul ADR | AugOCC | AugADR | SepOCC | SepADR |
|
|
53.95%
|
$74.05
|
51.84%
|
$68.83
|
41.00%
|
$64.35
|
|
|
62.56%
|
$45.75
|
70.39%
|
$49.56
|
68.33%
|
$47.51
|
|
|
74.21%
|
$53.74
|
66.94%
|
$51.59
|
63.46%
|
$53.10
|
|
|
67.99%
|
$70.72
|
73.70%
|
$69.06
|
71.40%
|
$67.92
|
|
|
71.11%
|
$89.49
|
61.44%
|
$75.78
|
63.45%
|
$70.30
|
|
|
71.35%
|
$75.14
|
69.21%
|
$56.41
|
70.86%
|
$55.15
|
|
|
66.07%
|
$74.17
|
59.93%
|
$82.58
|
54.82%
|
$60.67
|
| Statewide |
66.75%
|
$69.01
|
64.78%
|
$64.83
|
61.90%
|
$59.86
|
Table 5 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic Development Region
October, November and December 1998
|
|
Oct OCC | Oct ADR | NovOCC | NovADR | DecOCC | DecADR |
|
|
55.78%
|
$67.96
|
28.22%
|
$57.64
|
22.49%
|
$69.75
|
|
|
69.76%
|
$48.29
|
56.79%
|
$50.14
|
51.28%
|
$42.40
|
|
|
73.71%
|
$59.85
|
59.75%
|
$59.16
|
41.45%
|
$55.48
|
|
|
77.51%
|
$81.78
|
67.82%
|
$77.92
|
47.11%
|
$155.06
|
|
|
61.65%
|
$64.72
|
44.05%
|
$54.73
|
28.02%
|
$58.52
|
|
|
62.60%
|
$56.18
|
45.95%
|
$51.87
|
35.34%
|
$42.02
|
|
|
47.13%
|
$57.85
|
38.52%
|
$52.85
|
26.33%
|
$54.35
|
| Statewide |
64.02%
|
$62.37
|
48.73%
|
$57.76
|
35.90%
|
$56.37
|
Results by Lodging Classification
In addition to stratifying by region, a breakdown of accommodations
by lodging classification lends a helpful perspective to visitation trends.
The Office of Park and Tourism Research asked accommodations to classify
their properties in one of the following categories: full-service, limited
service hotel/motel with restaurant facilities nearby, limited service
hotel/ motel without restaurant nearby, and bed & breakfast. Below
are the occupancy and average daily rates data according to these classifications.
Note these tables report only those properties that responded to the classification
question. Many convention and visitor bureaus report an aggregated occupancy
and average daily rate for their area. In these cases, a breakdown is not
available. The maximum numbers of properties included in each classification
are small: B&B = 18, Full Service = 11, Limited Service with Nearby
Restaurant Facilities = 7, Limited Service without Nearby Restaurant Facilities
= 36.
Table 6 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging Classification
January, February and March 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging Classification
April, May and June 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging Classification
July, August, and September 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$59.83 |
|
|
Table 9 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging Classification
October, November, and December 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participating and Non-participating Counties
If one or more properties responded during the most recent reporting
month, that county is counted as participating. Counties shown as not participating
are those in which no properties returned the survey instrument. Some counties
do not have properties selected for participation in the sample survey.
The table reflects responses received for December, 1998
Table 10. Participating and Non-participating Counties
by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avery, Caldwell, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, Madison, McDowell, Rutherford, Swain, Watauga, Yancey | Alleghany, Ashe, Buncombe, Burke, Cherokee, Clay, Cleveland, Graham, Mitchell, Polk, Transylvania, Wilkes, |
|
|
Catawba, Gaston, Iredell, Rowan | Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Lincoln, Mecklenberg, Union, Stanley |
|
|
Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, | Alamance, Caswell, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Surry, Yadkin |
|
|
Chatham, Durham, Moore, Orange, Wake | Franklin, Granville, Harnett, Johnston, Lee, Person, Warren |
|
|
Carteret, Craven, Onslow | Duplin, Edgcombe, Greene, Jones, Lenoir, Nash, Pamlico, Pitt, Wayne, Wilson |
|
|
Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Richmond | Bladen, Columbus, Cumberland, Hoke, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland |
|
|
Beaufort, Dare, Hertford, Hyde | Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Currituk, Gates, Halifax, Martin Perquimans, Northampton, Pasquotank, Tyrell, Washington |
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of all the lodging properties that have participated in our data collection efforts in such a timely manner. If you have questions concerning the accommodations survey, please contact Dr. Gene Brothers (919-515-3699) or Samantha Mitchell (919-788-9389). Monthly report available at http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/tourism/optr/zreport.htm