Statewide Results
The charts below illustrate statewide averages for occupancy
and average daily rates.
Figure 1
Figure 2

Table1 illustrates the changes in occupancy and average daily rates over the last five years. Note that comparisons are made with the Quarters of past years. Comparisons also reflect a change in Economic Development Regions as of August 1997. Seasonal properties that were closed during these months are not included in the calculations.
Table 1. Comparison of Statewide Occupancy and Average Daily Rates, 1996-2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Feb OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Feb ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mar OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mar ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Apr OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Apr ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| May OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| May ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jun OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jun ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jul OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jul ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aug OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aug ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sep OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sep ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oct OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Oct ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nov OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nov ADR |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dec OCC |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dec ADR |
|
|
|
|
Regional Results
The rest of this report presents the results of the monthly accommodations survey for September 1999 through August 2000. The 7 economic development regions as defined by the North Carolina Travel and Tourism Division are used.
Table 2 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic
Development Region
September, October and November 1999
|
|
SepOCC | SepADR | OctOCC | OctADR | NovOCC | NovADR |
|
|
40.73%
|
$82.48
|
62.59%
|
$77.60
|
37.58%
|
$88.56
|
|
|
61.22%
|
$47.87
|
59.29%
|
$59.15
|
54.37%
|
$41.05
|
|
|
55.17%
|
$57.65
|
69.74%
|
$64.47
|
56.42%
|
$55.50
|
|
|
50.67%
|
$79.40
|
63.06%
|
$86.65
|
55.56%
|
$73.74
|
|
|
37.69%
|
$94.05
|
47.16%
|
$60.02
|
41.95%
|
$65.32
|
|
|
49.15%
|
$73.20
|
66.78%
|
$65.12
|
49.25%
|
$64.04
|
|
|
65.66%
|
$91.65
|
59.75%
|
$73.04
|
61.33%
|
$67.92
|
|
|
53.26%
|
$73.97
|
60.96%
|
$68.08
|
53.15%
|
$61.26
|
Table 3 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic
Development Region
December 1999, January and February 2000
|
|
DecOCC | DecADR | JanOCC | JanADR | FebOCC | FebADR |
|
|
28.97%
|
$80.32
|
22.00%
|
$77.83
|
27.57%
|
$73.20
|
|
|
55.65%
|
$41.70
|
48.90%
|
$47.63
|
55.98%
|
$47.14
|
|
|
42.81%
|
$53.85
|
47.57%
|
$48.30
|
59.44%
|
$50.85
|
|
|
37.84%
|
$73.75
|
47.81%
|
$71.76
|
50.52%
|
$75.69
|
|
|
30.40%
|
$68.79
|
17.69%
|
$60.27
|
30.63%
|
$54.96
|
|
|
43.34%
|
$68.59
|
44.72%
|
$62.28
|
45.06%
|
$61.41
|
|
|
54.98%
|
$40.18
|
43.87%
|
$65.25
|
34.26%
|
$78.05
|
| Statewide |
44.17%
|
$57.81
|
41.76%
|
$59.25
|
45.98%
|
$61.35
|
Table 4 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic
Development Region
March, April and May2000
|
|
MarOCC | MarADR | AprOCC | AprADR | MayOCC | MayADR |
|
|
29.62%
|
$64.09
|
40.77%
|
$69.93
|
37.19%
|
$80.42
|
|
|
53.33%
|
$46.46
|
62.05%
|
$48.13
|
44.40%
|
$48.75
|
|
|
65.21%
|
$50.82
|
76.07%
|
$61.37
|
73.13%
|
$52.22
|
|
|
54.65%
|
$81.27
|
54.36%
|
$87.95
|
53.15%
|
$77.60
|
|
|
35.95%
|
$70.08
|
56.52%
|
$92.96
|
53.91%
|
$88.71
|
|
|
49.92%
|
$65.71
|
52.60%
|
$59.49
|
66.01%
|
$68.05
|
|
|
45.11%
|
$62.25
|
57.42%
|
$76.67
|
68.94%
|
$100.62
|
| Statewide |
50.69%
|
$62.76
|
59.84%
|
$71.10
|
59.92%
|
$72.66
|
Table 5 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Economic
Development Region
June, July and August 2000
|
|
JunOCC | JunADR | JulOCC | JulADR | AugOCC | AugADR |
|
|
50.37%
|
$83.92
|
60.29%
|
$83.98
|
48.13%
|
$82.62
|
|
|
46.57%
|
$47.04
|
52.57%
|
$36.92
|
58.60%
|
$36.28
|
|
|
68.97%
|
$49.02
|
66.16%
|
$57.06
|
69.30%
|
$54.56
|
|
|
51.49%
|
$79.94
|
47.55%
|
$71.02
|
53.08%
|
$79.10
|
|
|
76.13%
|
$90.70
|
64.07%
|
$81.76
|
55.48%
|
$83.96
|
|
|
67.16%
|
$66.94
|
70.23%
|
$60.71
|
61.16%
|
$58.62
|
|
|
66.31%
|
$86.33
|
67.38%
|
$84.89
|
68.79%
|
$71.01
|
| Statewide |
62.77%
|
$69.99
|
61.33%
|
$65.39
|
61.07%
|
$63.92
|
Results by Lodging Classification
Table 6 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging
Classification
September, October and November 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging
Classification
December 1999, January and February 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging
Classification
March, April and May 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9 Occupancy and Average Daily Rates by Lodging
Classification
June, July and August 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participating and Non-participating Counties
Table 10. Participating and Non-participating Counties by Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avery, Cherokee, Cherokee Reservation, Haywood, Madison, Rutherford, Swain, Yancey, Watauga, Jackson | Alleghany, Ashe, Burke, Clay , Graham, Mitchell, Polk, Transylvania, Wilkes, Caldwell, Stokes, Henderson, Buncombe, Macon, McDowell, |
|
|
Catawba, Rowan, Cleveland | Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Iredell, Lincoln, Stanley, Union, Gaston, Mecklenberg |
|
|
Rockingham, Yadkin, Winston | Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Guilford, Randolph, Stokes, Surry, Alamance, Forsyth |
|
|
Chatham, Moore, Orange | Franklin, Granville, Johnston, Lee, Person, Vance, Wake, Warren, Durham, Harnett |
|
|
Carteret, Craven, Onslow | Duplin, Edgcombe, Greene, Jones, Lenoir, Pitt, Wayne, Wilson |
|
|
Brunswick, New Hanover, Richmond, Scotland, Cumberland | Bladen, Hoke, Pender, Robeson, Sampson, Columbus |
|
|
Beaufort, Dare, Hertford, Nash | Bertie, Camden, Currituk, Gates, Halifax, Hyde, Northampton, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrell, Washington, Chowan, Martin |
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of all the lodging properties that have participated in our data collection efforts in such a timely manner. If you have questions concerning the accommodations survey, please contact Dr. Gene Brothers (919-515-3699) or Parul Shah (919-515-9517). Monthly report available at http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/tourism/optr/zreport.htm