NCSU brick

 

Nursery Crop Science

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

Organic Fertilizers for Basil Transplant Production
Michelle McGinnis, Al Cooke, Ted Bilderback, and Mary Lorscheider


Basil is a top-selling retail herb during the spring and early summer months. Some markets may be willing to pay a premium for basil grown under organic conditions. Vermicompost or worm castings is often used as a sustainable soil amendment by organic growers for transplant production, and the literature shows that the use of worm castings can have positive effects on root development and growth, plant development, and field crop yield.
This project was initiated to evaluate the use of worm castings as a substrate amendment with five commercial organic fertilizers. We were interested in container life of the organic fertilizers, effects of the fertilizers on pH, and whether a worm castings amendment affected the behavior of the organic fertilizer.
Basil seeds (Osimum basilicum ‘Genovese’) were sown into 98-plug trays with a peat-based substrate amended with 10% worm castings on August 15, 2002. Seedlings were grown with no fertilization, and upon the development of the first set of true leaves were transplanted into the fertilizer treatments. The basil seedling plugs were transplanted into ITML 4.5-inch geranium pots (4.5-inch diameter, 3 7/8-inch high, 37 cu. in.) with 11 fertilizer treatments and 7 replications per treatment on September 5, 2002. Treatments included 5 organic fertilizers with and without commercial worm castings (Vermicycle Organics) and one treatment with worm castings but no additional fertilizer.
The substrate was a commercial blend of peat, perlite, vermiculite, and pine bark to which additional perlite was added resulting in the following volumetric analysis for the basic substrate: Peat 38.7%, Perlite 38.0%, Vermiculite 11.6%, and Pine bark 11.6%. For the vermicompost amended substrate, worm castings were blended into the basic substrate resulting in Peat 34.9%, Perlite 34.2%, Vermiculite 10.5%, Pine bark 10.5%, and Worm castings 10%. The following treatments were created by mixing the indicated amount of fertilizer with either the basic substrate or the vermicompost substrate. The fertilizers were incorporated at a rate of 1.2 g N/pot:
EHO Espoma Holly-tone 4-6-4 (30 grams)
EHW Espoma Holly-tone 4-6-4 (30 grams) with worm castings
EPO Espoma Plant-tone 5-3-3 (24 grams)
EPW Espoma Plant-tone 5-3-3 (24 grams) with worm castings
FSO Fertrell Super 3-2-3 (40 grams)
FSW Fertrell Super 3-2-3 (40 grams) with worm castings
N1O Nature Safe 8-5-5 (15 grams)
N1W Nature Safe 8-5-5 (15 grams) with worm castings
N2O Nature Safe 10-2-8 (12 grams)
N2W Nature Safe 10-2-8 (12 grams) with worm castings
WCW media with worm castings (no additional fertilizer)
The potted basil plants were set outside in the nursery in a completely randomized block and watered in. Plants were hand watered as needed. Starting on September 10, 2002, pour-thru tests were conducted, and EC and pH measurements were obtained for randomly selected plants for a period of 6 weeks. A composite leachate sample for each treatment was collected at the first time point, September 10, and submitted to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture’s Agronomic Lab for analysis.
Endpoints measured are growth index, fresh weight, dry weight, number of fully formed leaves, and number of lateral shoots. The growth index was calculated by the following:
[([(max width + min width) / 2] + height) / 2 ] final - [([(max width + min width) /2 ] + height) / 2] initial
Nutrient leachate analyses 5 days after pot up indicate the highest concentrations of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Zn, B, and Cl in one or both of the Espoma Holly-tone treatments (EHO or EHW). The highest Cu and Na concentrations were found in the Espoma Plant-tone with worm castings treatment (EPW).
All treatments had high levels of nitrogen, however the Espoma Holly-tone treatments (EHO and EHW) had the highest concentration of total inorganic nitrogen, indicating the nitrogen in this fertilizer was fast-releasing in our conditions. Ammonium was detected in the samples from all fertilizer treatments, nitrate was detected in the Espoma Holly-tone treatments (EHO and EHW), the worm castings only treatment (WCW), and in the Nature Safe fertilizers with worm castings (N1W and N2W). Urea was detected in the Nature Safe and Fertrell Super treatments (N1O, N1W, N2O, N2W, FSO, and FSW) as well as the Espoma Plant-tone with worm castings (EPW).
The pH readings for both Fertrell Super treatments (FSO and FSW) had the highest pH measurements, as the only treatments with measurements above 7.5 at the first time point (9/5/03) and the last time point (10/14/02).
A significant difference for fresh weight was found for N1W above all other treatments. Significant differences for dry weight, growth index, and number of fully formed leaves was found for N1W and N2W above all other treatments. FSO, FSW, and WCW consistently rated significantly lower on the above referenced endpoint measures. No distinct significant differences between the treatments were noted for number of side shoots. EHW was not included in that statistical analysis due to small sample size cause by a high mortality rate, believed to be caused either by transplant stress or high salt content.
In conclusion:
* Nutrients from Espoma Holly-tone (EHO and EHW) released rapidly under our conditions.
* The Fertrell Super treatments (FSO and FSW) appeared to cause undesirably high pH under our conditions.
* Depending on desirable endpoints, economics, and/or logistics, Espoma Plant-tone (EPO and EPW), Nature Safe 8-5-5 without castings (N1O) and Nature Safe 10-2-8 without castings (N2O) yielded saleable plants.
* The addition of worm castings to the Nature Safe treatments (N1W and N2W) showed a significant difference with respect to growth index, number of fully formed leaves, fresh weight, and dry weight.

back to 2003 short course